“Right to be Forgotten”
- Manyanshi Joshi
- 10 hours ago
- 5 min read

The “Right to be Forgotten” (RTBF) online is a data privacy right that allows individuals to request the removal or deletion of their personal information from the internet under certain conditions.
🔍 What it means
It gives you the ability to ask organizations (like websites, companies, or search engines) to delete or stop showing personal data about you.
This could include:
Old news articles
Personal details (address, photos, etc.)
Outdated or harmful information appearing in search results
👉 Example: You can request a search engine like Google to remove links about you if they are irrelevant, inaccurate, or no longer necessary.
⚖️ Legal basis
The concept became prominent after a 2014 European court ruling.
It is now part of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) under Article 17 (Right to Erasure).
✅ When you can use it
You can request deletion if:
The data is no longer needed for its original purpose
You withdraw consent
The data is incorrect, outdated, or excessive
The data was processed unlawfully
❌ Limitations (very important)
This right is not absolute:
It may be refused if:
The information is in public interest (e.g., news, criminal records)
Required for legal obligations
Needed for freedom of expression or journalism
Also:
Removing a link from search results does not always delete the original content—it just makes it harder to find.
🌍 Availability
Strongly enforced in the European Union (GDPR)
Exists in some form in other countries, but not universally recognized
🧠 Simple way to understand
Think of it like this:
You can ask the internet to “forget” certain personal information about you—but only when it’s reasonable and doesn’t conflict with public interest.
Applying the Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) online usually involves making formal requests to either search engines or the websites holding your data. The process is practical but requires clarity and patience.
🔎 1. Removing your name from Google search results
You can request link removal from Google.
📝 Steps:
Go to Google’s “Remove personal information” form
Choose the reason (e.g., outdated, irrelevant, harmful info)
Submit:
Your name and contact details
URLs you want removed
Search queries (your name, etc.)
Explanation of why removal is justified
Upload ID (sometimes required for verification)
Submit and wait for review
⏳ What happens next:
Google evaluates:
Public interest vs. your privacy
Accuracy and relevance of the content
If approved → the link is removed from search results (not the website itself)
🌐 2. Removing data from a specific website
This is often more effective because it deletes the source.
📝 Steps:
Find the website’s privacy policy / contact page
Look for:
“Data protection officer (DPO)”
“Contact us” or “Legal” section
Send a formal request asking for data erasure
✉️ Example request (you can copy this):
Subject
Request for Erasure of Personal Data under Right to be Forgotten Request for Erasure of Personal Data under Right to be Forgotten
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request the removal of my personal data from your website under applicable data protection laws.
The personal data in question appears at the following URL(s):[Insert links]
This information is [outdated/irrelevant/inaccurate] and is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was processed.
I kindly request that you erase this data and confirm once the request has been completed.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,[Your Name]
⚖️ 3. If your request is rejected
You still have options:
Ask the organization for a clear reason
Escalate to a data protection authority (like EU regulators)
In some cases, take legal action
🇮🇳 What about India?
India doesn’t have a full GDPR-style law yet, but:
Courts (like the Delhi High Court) have recognized RTBF in some cases
Under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, you can:
Request correction or erasure of personal data from companies
⚠️ Practical tips
Be specific (exact URLs, not general complaints)
Keep your tone formal and factual
Focus on:
Harm caused
Outdated or irrelevant nature of data
Avoid emotional arguments—legal reasoning works better
🧠 Key takeaway
Google removal = hides search results
Website removal = deletes the actual content
👉 Doing both together gives the best result.
real-world style examples of how the Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) is used online:
🧾 1. Old criminal record appearing in search results
A person was involved in a minor crime years ago, served their sentence, and moved on. However, when their name is searched on Google, old news articles still appear.
👉 They can request:
Removal of those links from search results
Reason: information is outdated and no longer relevant
⚖️ Often approved if:
The crime was minor
Enough time has passed
No strong public interest remains
📰 2. Outdated news article harming reputation
A news article published years ago mentions someone in a negative context (e.g., business failure or investigation that led nowhere).
👉 The person requests:
Search engines to de-index the article
Possibly the publisher to update/remove it
⚖️ Decision depends on:
Public interest vs. personal harm
Whether the information is still accurate/relevant
💼 3. Personal data on a company website
A former employee’s name, photo, and contact details remain on a company’s website after they leave.
👉 They can ask the company directly to:
Delete their personal data
⚖️ Usually approved because:
Data is no longer needed for its original purpose
📱 4. Social media content you regret
Someone posted photos or personal information years ago on platforms like Facebook or Instagram and now wants them removed.
👉 Options:
Delete the content yourself
Request platform removal if you no longer control the account
⚖️ Approved if:
You are the data subject
No overriding public interest exists
🧒 5. Childhood or sensitive personal information
A person finds embarrassing or sensitive content (posted when they were a minor) still online.
👉 They can request:
Removal from both search engines and websites
⚖️ Strong chance of approval because:
Involves privacy of minors
💳 6. Personal information leaked online
Someone’s phone number, address, or financial details are published on a forum or website.
👉 They can request:
Immediate removal from the website
De-indexing from search engines
⚖️ Usually fast-tracked because:
It poses privacy and safety risks
⚖️ 7. Famous case example
The concept became widely known after a case involving Mario Costeja González.
He asked Google to remove links to an old debt notice
The case went to the Court of Justice of the European Union
Result: Established the Right to be Forgotten in EU law
🚫 When it usually does NOT apply
Serious crimes or ongoing legal matters
Public figures (politicians, celebrities)
Information in strong public interest
🧠 Simple pattern behind all examples
RTBF generally works when:
Data is old, irrelevant, or excessive
It causes unfair harm
There’s no strong public interest in keeping it public
The Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) has become a key part of modern digital privacy, especially since its recognition under the General Data Protection Regulation. At its core, it reflects a shift in power—giving individuals more control over how their personal information appears and persists online.
In practice, RTBF helps people move on from outdated, irrelevant, or harmful information by allowing them to request its removal from search engines like Google or from the original source. This can protect reputation, dignity, and personal safety in an age where information spreads quickly and can remain accessible indefinitely.
At the same time, the right is not unlimited. It must be carefully balanced against other important values such as freedom of expression, transparency, and public interest. Courts and regulators—such as the Court of Justice of the European Union—play a crucial role in maintaining this balance, ensuring that privacy does not override the public’s right to know.
In countries like India, evolving frameworks such as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 show that the idea is gaining recognition, though its application is still developing.
In conclusion, the Right to be Forgotten is not about erasing history, but about ensuring fairness—allowing individuals to leave behind information that no longer defines them, while still preserving what genuinely matters to society.
Thanks for reading!!!!